Definition/General

Introduction:
-Vulvar clear cell carcinoma is a rare adenocarcinoma subtype characterized by cells with clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm
-It comprises less than 1% of all vulvar malignancies
-Shows distinctive hobnail cell morphology
-Associated with diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure in some cases
-Demonstrates aggressive clinical behavior.
Origin:
-Arises from Bartholin glands or embryonic remnants
-May originate from mesonephric duct remnants
-Can arise from endometriotic foci
-Shows müllerian differentiation
-Associated with DES exposure (maternal ingestion).
Classification:
-Classified as adenocarcinoma, clear cell type
-WHO classification includes under glandular tumors
-Shows similar morphology to cervical and vaginal clear cell carcinoma
-High-grade malignancy by definition
-No standard grading system.
Epidemiology:
-Peak incidence in 3rd-5th decades
-Younger than conventional vulvar cancers
-Associated with DES exposure (in utero)
-Higher incidence in nulliparous women
-No clear HPV association
-Extremely rare entity worldwide.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Vulvar mass or nodule
-May present as Bartholin gland cyst
-Bleeding (contact or spontaneous)
-Vulvar pain and discomfort
-Rapid growth pattern
-Early lymph node involvement possible.
Symptoms:
-Vulvar pain (60-70%)
-Bleeding episodes (50-60%)
-Vulvar swelling and mass effect
-Dysuria (30-40%)
-Asymptomatic mass (20-30%)
-Constitutional symptoms (advanced cases).
Risk Factors:
-DES exposure (in utero)
-History of pelvic endometriosis
-Previous vulvar adenosis
-Nulliparity
-Young age (relative to other vulvar cancers)
-No established HPV association.
Screening:
-Regular gynecological examination
-Special attention in DES-exposed patients
-Clinical examination of vulva
-Early biopsy of suspicious lesions
-Imaging for extent assessment.

Master Clear Cell Carcinoma Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Well-circumscribed nodular mass
-Tan to gray-white cut surface
-Soft to firm consistency
-May show cystic areas
-Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis.
Characteristics:
-Size typically 2-8 cm in diameter
-Relatively well-circumscribed margins
-Cut surface shows solid areas with cysts
-May have mucoid appearance
-Surface may be intact or ulcerated.
Size Location:
-Variable size (usually 3-6 cm)
-Commonly arises from Bartholin gland area
-May involve vestibule
-Posterior fourchette involvement
-Can be deeply seated
-May extend to adjacent structures.
Multifocality:
-Usually unifocal
-May be associated with vulvar adenosis
-Local extension common
-Lymph node involvement in advanced cases
-Distant metastases possible.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Characterized by cells with clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm
-Hobnail cell morphology (protruding nuclei)
-Tubulocystic and papillary patterns
-PAS-positive, diastase-resistant cytoplasm
-Basement membrane thickening.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Clear cytoplasm (glycogen-rich)
-Hobnail cells with protruding nuclei
-Cuboidal to columnar cells
-Moderate nuclear pleomorphism
-Prominent nucleoli
-Variable mitotic activity.
Architectural Patterns:
-Tubulocystic pattern (most common)
-Papillary architecture
-Solid areas with clear cells
-Cribriform pattern
-Mixed architectural patterns common
-Hyalinized stroma.
Grading Criteria:
-Considered high-grade by definition
-Nuclear grade assessment important
-Mitotic activity variable
-Architectural complexity
-Stromal invasion pattern
-No standardized grading system.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-PAX8 (positive)
-CA-125 (positive)
-CK7 (positive)
-EMA (positive)
-Napsin A (positive)
-WT1 (positive)
-Vimentin (positive)
-ER (variable).
Negative Markers:
-CK20 (negative)
-TTF-1 (negative)
-CDX2 (negative)
-p63 (negative)
-CK5/6 (negative)
-CEA (negative)
-Calretinin (negative).
Diagnostic Utility:
-PAX8 positivity supports müllerian origin
-Napsin A helps distinguish from metastatic renal carcinoma
-CK7 positive, CK20 negative pattern
-p63 negativity excludes squamous carcinoma
-ER variability noted.
Molecular Subtypes:
-DES-related vs sporadic types
-Müllerian phenotype (PAX8+, CK7+)
-Different from renal clear cell carcinoma
-Distinct immunoprofile.

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-PIK3CA mutations (20-30%)
-PTEN loss (15-25%)
-TP53 mutations (variable)
-ARID1A mutations (10-20%)
-Different from renal clear cell carcinoma profile
-Limited molecular data due to rarity.
Molecular Markers:
-PAX8 overexpression
-CA-125 elevation
-Variable ER expression
-Napsin A positivity
-Ki-67 proliferation index (moderate)
-Loss of PTEN expression.
Prognostic Significance:
-Stage at presentation most important factor
-Size correlates with prognosis
-Lymph node status crucial
-Histological pattern may influence outcome
-Early detection improves prognosis.
Therapeutic Targets:
-Limited targeted therapy options
-Platinum-based chemotherapy
-Possible benefit from antiangiogenic agents
-Hormonal therapy (ER-positive cases)
-Immunotherapy under investigation.

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Metastatic clear cell carcinoma (renal, ovarian)
-Yolk sac tumor
-Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma
-Metastatic endometrial carcinoma
-Sebaceous carcinoma.
Distinguishing Features:
-Vulvar clear cell: PAX8 positive
-Vulvar clear cell: Napsin A positive
-Renal clear cell: RCC marker positive
-Renal clear cell: PAX8 negative (usually)
-Yolk sac: AFP positive
-Yolk sac: Young age
-Sebaceous: Oil Red O positive.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Differentiation from metastatic renal carcinoma
-Distinction from yolk sac tumor (young patients)
-Separation from Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma
-Immunohistochemistry essential
-Clinical correlation important.
Rare Variants:
-Mixed patterns with other adenocarcinoma types
-Predominantly solid variant
-Signet ring features (rare)
-Mixed with squamous elements (rare).

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

[specimen type], measuring [size] cm in greatest dimension

Diagnosis

Vulvar Clear Cell Carcinoma

Classification

Classification: Adenocarcinoma, clear cell type, high-grade

Histological Features

Shows clear cells with [architectural pattern] and [hobnail morphology]

Size and Extent

Size: [X] cm, extent: [local/regional]

Margins

Margins are [involved/uninvolved] with closest margin [X] mm

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Immunohistochemistry

PAX8: [positive/negative], CA-125: [positive/negative]

Napsin A: [positive/negative]

p63: [negative], RCC marker: [negative]

Prognostic Factors

Tumor size, architectural pattern, lymphovascular invasion, margin status

Final Diagnosis

Vulvar Clear Cell Carcinoma (Adenocarcinoma, clear cell type)