Definition/General

Introduction:
-Vaginal squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the vagina, accounting for 85-90% of all vaginal cancers
-It arises from the stratified squamous epithelium lining the vaginal mucosa
-Most cases are secondary to cervical cancer or represent metastases from other sites
-Primary vaginal carcinoma is diagnosed only when the cervix and vulva are uninvolved.
Origin:
-Originates from the stratified squamous epithelium of the vaginal mucosa
-Most commonly develops in the upper third of the vagina, particularly the posterior wall
-The neoplastic transformation is often preceded by vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN)
-Strong association with high-risk HPV, especially types 16 and 18
-The tumor shows progressive invasion through the vaginal wall into surrounding structures.
Classification:
-Classified according to FIGO staging system
-Stage I: Carcinoma limited to vaginal wall
-Stage II: Carcinoma involving paravaginal tissues
-Stage III: Extension to pelvic wall
-Stage IV: Extension beyond pelvis or involvement of bladder/rectal mucosa
-WHO classification includes keratinizing and non-keratinizing variants
-Grading follows three-tier system: well-differentiated (Grade 1), moderately differentiated (Grade 2), poorly differentiated (Grade 3).
Epidemiology:
-Accounts for 1-2% of all gynecological malignancies
-Peak incidence in 6th-7th decades of life
-Median age at diagnosis is 60-65 years
-HPV-related cases occur in younger women (40-50 years)
-Strong association with history of cervical dysplasia or carcinoma
-Risk factors include immunosuppression, chronic irritation, and smoking
-Indian studies show increasing incidence with improving diagnostic awareness.

Clinical Features

Presentation:
-Abnormal vaginal bleeding (80-90% of cases), especially post-coital or post-menopausal bleeding
-Vaginal discharge (watery, bloody, or purulent)
-Pelvic pain and dyspareunia
-Urinary symptoms (frequency, urgency, dysuria) in advanced cases
-Bowel symptoms (tenesmus, constipation) with posterior wall involvement
-Mass effect symptoms in bulky tumors.
Symptoms:
-Vaginal bleeding (most common presenting symptom)
-Malodorous discharge with secondary infection
-Pelvic pressure and discomfort
-Dyspareunia and post-coital bleeding
-Urinary incontinence or retention in advanced cases
-Fecal incontinence with rectovaginal fistula
-Leg edema due to lymphatic obstruction
-Constitutional symptoms (weight loss, fatigue) in advanced disease.
Risk Factors:
-High-risk HPV infection (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45)
-History of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma
-Immunosuppression (HIV, organ transplantation)
-Chronic irritation (pessary use, chronic infections)
-Smoking and tobacco use
-Multiple sexual partners and early sexual activity
-Low socioeconomic status and poor hygiene
-Previous pelvic radiation therapy.
Screening:
-Pap smear may detect vaginal cells
-HPV testing for high-risk types
-Colposcopy with directed biopsy for suspicious lesions
-Annual pelvic examination for high-risk women
-Post-hysterectomy surveillance in women with history of cervical dysplasia
-Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in resource-limited settings.

Master Vaginal SCC Pathology with RxDx

Access 100+ pathology videos and expert guidance with the RxDx app

Gross Description

Appearance:
-Exophytic, polypoid growth with irregular, friable surface
-Ulcerative lesions with raised, rolled margins
-Flat, plaque-like lesions in early stages
-Gray-white to pink coloration with areas of necrosis
-Hemorrhage and ulceration in advanced cases
-Surface may show keratin formation in well-differentiated tumors.
Characteristics:
-Firm to hard consistency depending on degree of keratinization
-Friable surface that bleeds easily on manipulation
-Irregular margins with infiltrative growth pattern
-Necrotic areas with foul-smelling discharge
-Involvement of vaginal fornices in upper third tumors
-Extension to paravaginal tissues in advanced cases.
Size Location:
-Size ranges from small focal lesions to large masses (>5 cm)
-Upper third of vagina most commonly affected (60-70%)
-Posterior wall more frequently involved than anterior wall
-Middle third involvement in 20-30% of cases
-Lower third involvement in 10-15% of cases
-Multifocal disease can occur, especially in HPV-related cases.
Multifocality:
-Multifocal presentation in 10-20% of cases, especially in immunocompromised patients
-Skip lesions may be present along the vaginal canal
-Concurrent cervical involvement must be excluded for primary vaginal carcinoma diagnosis
-Vulvar extension may occur in lower third tumors
-Association with multicentric VAIN lesions.

Microscopic Description

Histological Features:
-Invasive nests and cords of malignant squamous cells extending into vaginal stroma
-Keratin pearl formation in well-differentiated tumors
-Nuclear pleomorphism with enlarged, hyperchromatic nuclei
-Prominent nucleoli and increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio
-Mitotic activity with atypical mitoses
-Desmoplastic stromal response with chronic inflammation.
Cellular Characteristics:
-Polygonal cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm in keratinizing type
-Intercellular bridges (desmosomes) characteristic of squamous differentiation
-Individual cell keratinization with pyknotic nuclei
-Non-keratinizing type shows larger cells with less cytoplasm
-Basaloid pattern in poorly differentiated tumors
-Koilocytic changes in HPV-associated cases.
Architectural Patterns:
-Invasive nests and cords with irregular infiltrative pattern
-Large tumor islands in well-differentiated cases
-Single cell infiltration in poorly differentiated tumors
-Perineural invasion may be present in aggressive cases
-Lymphovascular invasion indicates metastatic potential
-Surface ulceration with reactive epithelial changes at margins.
Grading Criteria:
-Well-differentiated (Grade 1): >75% keratinization with keratin pearls
-Moderately differentiated (Grade 2): 25-75% keratinization with moderate nuclear pleomorphism
-Poorly differentiated (Grade 3): <25% keratinization with marked nuclear pleomorphism
-Mitotic count and nuclear grade contribute to overall grading
-Presence of koilocytes suggests HPV association.

Immunohistochemistry

Positive Markers:
-p40 (nuclear, highly sensitive for squamous differentiation)
-p63 (nuclear, marks basal and squamous cells)
-CK5/6 (cytoplasmic, squamous epithelial marker)
-CK14 (cytoplasmic, basal and squamous cells)
-p16 (nuclear and cytoplasmic, HPV-associated cases show diffuse positivity)
-Ki-67 (nuclear, proliferation marker, elevated in malignant cases).
Negative Markers:
-CK7 (negative in most squamous cell carcinomas)
-CK20 (negative, helps exclude colorectal origin)
-TTF-1 (negative, helps exclude lung primary)
-ER/PR (negative in most cases)
-CDX2 (negative, excludes gastrointestinal origin)
-PAX8 (negative, excludes gynecological adenocarcinomas).
Diagnostic Utility:
-p16 overexpression indicates high-risk HPV association and better prognosis
-p40/p63 positivity confirms squamous differentiation
-CK5/6 expression helps differentiate from adenocarcinoma
-Ki-67 index correlates with tumor grade and prognosis
-Negative CK7 helps exclude metastatic adenocarcinoma
-Panel approach recommended for accurate classification.
Molecular Subtypes:
-HPV-positive type (p16 positive, better prognosis, younger age)
-HPV-negative type (p16 negative, worse prognosis, older age)
-Keratinizing type (often HPV-negative, worse prognosis)
-Non-keratinizing type (often HPV-positive, better prognosis)
-Basaloid variant (usually HPV-positive)
-Verrucous variant (HPV-associated, indolent behavior).

Molecular/Genetic

Genetic Mutations:
-HPV integration leads to E6 and E7 protein expression in 70-80% of cases
-TP53 mutations (40-60%, more common in HPV-negative cases)
-PIK3CA mutations (20-30% of cases)
-CDKN2A/p16 alterations (except in HPV-positive cases with p16 overexpression)
-PTEN mutations (15-20% of cases)
-RB pathway alterations (common in HPV-positive cases).
Molecular Markers:
-p16 overexpression (surrogate marker for HPV integration)
-Ki-67 overexpression (indicates high proliferative activity)
-p53 overexpression (more common in HPV-negative cases)
-Cyclin D1 amplification (subset of cases)
-EGFR overexpression (potential therapeutic target)
-PD-L1 expression (predictive marker for immunotherapy).
Prognostic Significance:
-HPV status is the most important prognostic factor (HPV-positive cases have better survival)
-Tumor grade correlates with prognosis (well-differentiated tumors have better outcomes)
-Stage at presentation is crucial (early-stage disease has 80-90% 5-year survival)
-Lymph node involvement significantly worsens prognosis
-p53 mutations associated with worse outcomes
-Age at diagnosis influences prognosis (younger patients with HPV-positive tumors do better).
Therapeutic Targets:
-HPV E6/E7 proteins (therapeutic vaccines under development)
-EGFR (cetuximab for EGFR-positive cases)
-PI3K/AKT pathway (PI3K inhibitors in PIK3CA-mutated cases)
-PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab for PD-L1 positive cases)
-DNA damage response (PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination deficient tumors)
-Angiogenesis (bevacizumab in recurrent disease).

Differential Diagnosis

Similar Entities:
-Vaginal adenocarcinoma (CK7 positive, mucin production)
-Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma from cervix or vulva
-Vaginal melanoma (S-100, melanoma markers positive)
-Vaginal sarcoma (mesenchymal markers positive)
-Vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma (PAX8 positive, clear cell morphology)
-Vaginal endometrioid adenocarcinoma (ER/PR positive, glandular architecture).
Distinguishing Features:
-Primary vs metastatic: Requires clinical correlation and absence of cervical/vulvar involvement
-SCC vs adenocarcinoma: p40/p63 positive vs CK7/PAX8 positive
-SCC vs melanoma: p40 positive vs S-100/SOX10 positive
-Keratinizing vs non-keratinizing: Presence of keratin pearls and individual cell keratinization
-HPV-positive vs negative: p16 expression pattern (diffuse vs focal/negative)
-Well vs poorly differentiated: Degree of keratinization and nuclear pleomorphism.
Diagnostic Challenges:
-Distinguishing primary from metastatic disease requires thorough clinical examination and imaging
-Small biopsy interpretation may be challenging due to sampling issues
-Reactive changes from radiation or infection can mimic malignancy
-VAIN vs invasive carcinoma: Assessment of basement membrane integrity crucial
-HPV status determination: p16 interpretation requires proper scoring criteria
-Grade assessment in poorly preserved specimens.
Rare Variants:
-Verrucous carcinoma (HPV 6/11 associated, locally aggressive but non-metastasizing)
-Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-associated, aggressive behavior)
-Warty (condylomatous) carcinoma (HPV-associated, intermediate behavior)
-Papillary squamous cell carcinoma (exophytic growth pattern)
-Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinoma (biphasic tumor with squamous and spindle components)
-Adenosquamous carcinoma (mixed squamous and glandular differentiation).

Sample Pathology Report

Template Format

Sample Pathology Report

Complete Report: This is an example of how the final pathology report should be structured for this condition.

Specimen Information

Vaginal biopsy/excision from [location] measuring [size] cm

Diagnosis

Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of vagina

Classification and Grade

[Keratinizing/Non-keratinizing] squamous cell carcinoma, Grade [1/2/3]

Histological Features

Shows invasive nests of malignant squamous cells with [degree] keratinization, [nuclear grade] nuclear pleomorphism, and [mitotic activity] mitotic activity

Invasion and Extent

Depth of invasion: [X] mm, extent: [superficial/deep stromal/paravaginal]

Margins

Margins are [involved/uninvolved], closest margin [X] mm from tumor

Lymphovascular Invasion

Lymphovascular invasion: [present/absent]

Special Studies

p40: [positive/negative], p63: [positive/negative], p16: [positive/negative/focal]

HPV status: [positive/negative] (by p16 immunohistochemistry)

Ki-67 index: [percentage]%

FIGO Staging

FIGO Stage: [I/II/III/IV] - [staging description]

Prognostic Factors

HPV status: [positive/negative], Grade: [1/2/3], Stage: [I/II/III/IV], LVI: [present/absent]

Final Diagnosis

Primary vaginal squamous cell carcinoma, [keratinizing/non-keratinizing], Grade [1/2/3], FIGO Stage [I/II/III/IV]