Overview

Definition:
-Port mapping in minimally invasive thoracic surgery refers to the strategic planning and placement of surgical ports (incisions for instruments and cameras) to optimize visualization, instrument triangulation, and operative efficiency
-It involves understanding critical anatomical landmarks and predicting the optimal angles of approach for various thoracic procedures.
Epidemiology:
-Minimally invasive thoracic surgery, including Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), is increasingly adopted worldwide for a wide range of thoracic pathologies
-The incidence of thoracic procedures performed via MIS approaches continues to rise, necessitating standardized and efficient port placement techniques.
Clinical Significance:
-Effective port mapping is crucial for successful thoracic MIS
-It directly impacts operative time, risk of complications (e.g., bleeding, organ injury), patient recovery, and overall surgical outcomes
-Proper planning enhances ergonomics for the surgeon and improves access to target pathologies while minimizing iatrogenic trauma.

Indications For Mis Thoracic Surgery

Common Indications:
-Resection of lung nodules/masses
-Lobectomy/bilobectomy for lung cancer
-Pleural procedures (pleurodesis, decortication)
-Management of pneumothorax
-Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis
-Esophageal resection for cancer
-Mediastinal mass excision.
Patient Selection Criteria:
-Generally suitable for patients with early-stage lung cancer
-Absence of extensive pleural disease or dense adhesions
-Adequate cardiopulmonary reserve
-Patient preference for minimally invasive approach.
Contraindications:
-Hemodynamic instability
-Severe coagulopathy
-Extensive adhesions from previous surgery or infection
-Significant empyema
-Need for extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy that is difficult via MIS
-Patient refusal or inability to tolerate one-lung ventilation.

Port Placement Principles

Triangulation:
-The concept of creating a triangular working space between the camera port and instrument ports
-This allows for optimal instrument manipulation and counter-traction, facilitating dissection and suture placement.
Ergonomics And Access:
-Ports should be placed to allow comfortable surgeon positioning and unimpeded instrument movement
-Access to the target pathology should be direct and without excessive crossing of instruments.
Anatomic Landmarks:
-Utilizing bony landmarks (ribs, intercostal spaces) and palpable thoracic structures to guide port placement
-Understanding the trajectory to vital structures (lung, pleura, pericardium, diaphragm).
Number And Size Of Ports:
-Typically 3-5 ports are used
-Port sizes range from 5mm to 12mm depending on the instruments and the need for specimen extraction
-The number of ports is minimized while ensuring adequate surgical control.

Port Mapping Strategies

Standard Vats Port Placement:
-For a standard left lung lobectomy, common ports include: Camera port (typically 4th or 5th intercostal space, anterior axillary line)
-Working port 1 (typically 7th or 8th intercostal space, posterior to camera port)
-Working port 2 (typically 4th or 5th intercostal space, posterior to camera port).
Anterior Approach Port Placement:
-Often used for anterior lesions or access to superior mediastinal structures
-Ports are placed more anteriorly, typically along the mid-clavicular or anterior axillary lines.
Posterior Approach Port Placement:
-Favored for posterior lesions or access to the diaphragmatic surface
-Ports are positioned along the posterior axillary or scapular lines.
Single Port Vats:
-Utilizes a single incision (typically 3-4 cm) through which a specialized port is placed, allowing for insertion of the camera and instruments
-Requires advanced skill and specific port systems.
Hybrid Vats:
-Combines a small anterior thoracotomy (e.g., 5-6 cm) for instrument passage with a camera port placed elsewhere
-Useful for situations requiring manual retraction or larger specimen extraction.

Preoperative Planning And Imaging

Role Of Imaging:
-CT scans (with contrast) are essential for defining lesion location, size, relationship to surrounding structures, and planning port placement
-3D reconstructions can further aid visualization of critical anatomy.
Ct Based Port Planning:
-Correlating imaging findings with the patient's chest wall anatomy
-Projecting optimal port trajectories onto the skin based on CT slice analysis.
Preoperative Discussion:
-Discussing the planned port configuration with the surgical team, including the assistant surgeon and scrub nurse
-Anticipating potential challenges and modifications.

Intraoperative Considerations And Modifications

Intraoperative Assessment:
-Initial inspection of the pleural cavity to confirm findings, assess adhesions, and refine port placement if necessary
-Direct visualization may alter the planned port locations.
Adapting To Anatomy:
-Flexibility in port placement is key
-If initial ports do not provide adequate access or visualization, additional ports or repositioning of existing ones may be required.
Managing Adhesions:
-Dense adhesions may necessitate additional working ports or conversion to a larger incision for safe dissection
-Careful planning and gentle dissection are paramount.
Specimen Extraction: Planning for a port site large enough for specimen retrieval, often utilizing a protective retrieval bag to prevent tumor cell dissemination or contamination.

Key Points

Exam Focus:
-Understanding the principles of triangulation and ergonomics is critical for VATS
-Common port sites for standard procedures (lobectomy) and their rationale are frequently tested
-Single-port and hybrid VATS techniques are also important areas of focus.
Clinical Pearls:
-Always perform a systematic preoperative planning using CT scans
-Be prepared to modify port placement intraoperatively based on findings
-Minimize the number of ports to reduce morbidity
-Use a retrieval bag for all resected specimens, especially malignant ones.
Common Mistakes:
-Placing ports too close together, leading to instrument collision
-Inadequate visualization due to poor port angles
-Neglecting to plan for specimen extraction
-Failure to anticipate and manage adhesions, leading to conversion.