Overview

Definition:
-Jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their precursors within the gastrointestinal tract
-Segmental resection involves the surgical removal of a specific segment of the jejunum containing the GIST, along with its mesentery, to achieve negative margins.
Epidemiology:
-GISTs are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract, accounting for less than 1% of all GI tumors
-They can occur anywhere along the GI tract, with the stomach (50-60%) and small intestine (20-30%, including jejunum and ileum) being the most common sites
-The incidence is approximately 5-20 cases per million per year
-They typically occur in adults aged 40-70 years, with no significant gender predilection.
Clinical Significance:
-Jejunal GISTs can present with a spectrum of symptoms depending on size and location, ranging from asymptomatic incidentally discovered lesions to life-threatening complications like bleeding or perforation
-Understanding the surgical management, particularly segmental resection for localized tumors, is crucial for achieving cure and preventing recurrence
-Proper oncological resection is key to patient outcomes, making this a vital topic for surgical trainees preparing for DNB and NEET SS examinations.

Indications

Surgical Indications:
-Surgical resection is the primary treatment for resectable GISTs
-Indications include: symptomatic tumors (bleeding, obstruction, pain, palpable mass), asymptomatic tumors greater than 5 cm in diameter, tumors with high mitotic activity (≥5 per high-power field), or tumors with features concerning for malignancy (e.g., necrosis, cystic changes, irregular borders) based on imaging
-Small, asymptomatic tumors (<2 cm) with low mitotic index may be considered for observation.
Contraindications:
-Absolute contraindications are rare for localized GISTs
-Relative contraindications may include unresectable disease due to extensive local invasion or distant metastases, or severe comorbidities that make the patient a poor surgical candidate
-In such cases, neoadjuvant or adjuvant imatinib therapy might be considered.
Preoperative Assessment:
-Preoperative assessment involves thorough history and physical examination, comprehensive laboratory workup (CBC, liver function tests, renal function tests), and detailed imaging
-Endoscopic evaluation (EGD, colonoscopy) may be performed if bleeding is suspected or to rule out synchronous GI lesions
-Cross-sectional imaging (CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast) is essential for staging, evaluating tumor size, location, extent of invasion, lymphadenopathy, and presence of distant metastases
-Biopsy is often avoided if the tumor is amenable to en bloc resection due to the risk of tumor seeding and potential for imatinib resistance if inappropriately treated before definitive surgery.

Surgical Management

Approach Selection:
-The surgical approach (laparoscopic vs
-open) depends on tumor size, location, complexity, surgeon expertise, and patient factors
-Laparoscopic resection is preferred for smaller, exophytic tumors with no signs of invasion into adjacent structures, offering benefits of minimally invasive surgery
-Open laparotomy is reserved for larger, deeply invasive tumors, or in cases where laparoscopic approach is not feasible.
Procedure Steps:
-The goal is en bloc resection with adequate margins
-For jejunal GISTs, this typically involves a segmental resection of the jejunum
-The procedure includes: 1
-Identification and mobilization of the affected jejunal segment
-2
-Ligation of mesenteric vessels supplying the segment
-3
-Transection of the jejunum proximal and distal to the tumor with adequate margins (typically 1-2 cm from gross tumor)
-4
-Excision of the tumor segment with involved mesentery
-5
-Reconstruction of the jejunal continuity, usually via an end-to-end or side-to-side anastomosis using staplers or sutures
-The specimen is then sent for pathological examination
-Careful hemostasis and inspection for leaks are paramount.
Margin Assessment:
-Pathological assessment of surgical margins is critical
-Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation for positive margins (tumor cells at the inked margin) guides further management
-Achieving R0 resection (no residual tumor) is the primary goal for cure.

Postoperative Care

Early Postoperative Management:
-Patients are monitored in a recovery area for vital signs, pain control, and signs of complications
-Nasogastric tube may be used for decompression
-Intravenous fluids and electrolytes are managed
-Early mobilization and incentive spirometry are encouraged
-Pain management is crucial, often using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or epidural anesthesia.
Dietary Advancement:
-Diet is advanced cautiously starting with clear liquids once bowel sounds return and flatus is passed, progressing to a soft diet as tolerated
-Monitoring for signs of anastomotic leak (e.g., abdominal distension, fever, peritonitis) is essential during this period.
Monitoring And Discharge:
-Patients are monitored for wound complications, signs of infection, and anastomotic leaks
-Serial abdominal examinations are performed
-Discharge planning includes wound care instructions, pain management, dietary recommendations, and follow-up appointment scheduling
-Patients are advised to avoid strenuous activity for several weeks.

Complications

Early Complications: Potential early complications include: anastomotic leak (most serious, presenting with peritonitis, sepsis), intra-abdominal abscess, bleeding (anastomotic or mesenteric), ileus, wound infection, hernia, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).
Late Complications: Late complications can include: adhesive small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia, stricture formation at the anastomosis, and tumor recurrence.
Prevention Strategies: Preventing complications involves meticulous surgical technique (careful tissue handling, secure hemostasis, leak-free anastomosis), appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, early mobilization, judicious use of anticoagulation for DVT prophylaxis, and thorough preoperative assessment and postoperative monitoring.

Prognosis

Prognostic Factors:
-Prognosis is primarily determined by tumor size, mitotic index, location, and the presence of distant metastases at diagnosis
-Genetic mutations (e.g., KIT, PDGFRA) also play a role
-Complete surgical resection (R0) significantly improves survival.
Outcomes:
-For localized, completely resected GISTs, the 5-year survival rate can be as high as 50-80% or more, depending on risk stratification
-Unresectable or metastatic GISTs have a poorer prognosis, but response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors like imatinib can significantly improve outcomes.
Follow Up:
-Postoperative follow-up is crucial for monitoring for recurrence and for assessing response to adjuvant therapy
-This typically involves serial clinical examinations, laboratory tests (including CEA and LDH, though less specific for GIST), and regular cross-sectional imaging (CT abdomen/pelvis, sometimes PET-CT) at intervals (e.g., every 3-6 months for the first 2-3 years, then annually)
-Follow-up duration is typically 5-10 years.

Key Points

Exam Focus:
-Jejunal GISTs are mesenchymal tumors requiring surgical resection for curative intent
-En bloc segmental resection with adequate margins is key
-The choice between laparoscopic and open surgery depends on tumor characteristics
-Risk stratification based on size, mitotic index, and mutation status guides prognosis and adjuvant therapy decisions.
Clinical Pearls:
-Always consider GIST in mesenchymal lesions of the GI tract
-Avoid biopsy of potentially resectable GISTs preoperatively unless absolutely necessary
-Laparoscopy is feasible for smaller, exophytic lesions
-Thorough mesenteric lymph node sampling is not typically required for GISTs, but adequate mesenteric clearance around the tumor is necessary
-Postoperative imatinib therapy is indicated for high-risk GISTs.
Common Mistakes:
-Inadequate surgical margins leading to positive resection margins and recurrence
-Performing a biopsy of a resectable GIST, leading to potential complications or altered treatment planning
-Incorrect risk stratification leading to inappropriate adjuvant therapy
-Insufficient or irregular postoperative follow-up, missing early signs of recurrence.